↓ Skip to main content

Novel no‐stop FLNA mutation causes multi‐organ involvement in males

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel no‐stop FLNA mutation causes multi‐organ involvement in males
Published in
American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/ajmg.a.36109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renske Oegema, Jessie M. Hulst, Sabine D.M. Theuns‐Valks, Leontine M.A. van Unen, Rachel Schot, Grazia M.S. Mancini, Marguerite E.I. Schipper, Marie C.Y. de Wit, Barbara J. Sibbles, Irenaeus F.M. de Coo, Veerle Nanninga, Robert M.W. Hofstra, Dicky J.J. Halley, Alice S. Brooks

Abstract

Mutations in FLNA (Filamin A, OMIM 300017) cause X-linked periventricular nodular heterotopia (XL-PNH). XL-PNH-associated mutations are considered lethal in hemizygous males. However, a few males with unusual mutations (including distal truncating and hypomorphic missense mutations), and somatic mosaicism have been reported to survive past infancy. Two brothers had an atypical presentation with failure to thrive and distinct facial appearance including hypertelorism. Evaluations of these brothers and their affected cousin showed systemic involvement including severe intestinal malfunction, malrotation, congenital short bowel, PNH, pyloric stenosis, wandering spleen, patent ductus arteriosus, atrial septal defect, inguinal hernia, and vesicoureteral reflux. The unanticipated finding of PNH led to FLNA testing and subsequent identification of a novel no-stop FLNA mutation (c.7941_7942delCT, p.(*2648Serext*100)). Western blotting and qRT-PCR of patients' fibroblasts showed diminished levels of protein and mRNA. This FLNA mutation, the most distal reported so far, causes in females classical XL-PNH, but in males an unusual, multi-organ phenotype, providing a unique insight into the FLNA-associated phenotypes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Master 6 15%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#2,940
of 4,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,315
of 208,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#49
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.