You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nonantibiotic Prophylaxis for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Urology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.142 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M.A.J. Beerepoot, S.E. Geerlings, E.P. van Haarst, N. Mensing van Charante, G. ter Riet |
| Abstract |
Increasing antimicrobial resistance has stimulated interest in nonantibiotic prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections. We assessed the effectiveness, tolerability and safety of nonantibiotic prophylaxis in adults with recurrent urinary tract infections. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | 50% |
| Panama | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 53 | 23% |
| Unknown | 46 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 50 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,311,213
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#114
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,746
of 207,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.