You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Decomposing social and semantic networks in emerging “big data” research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Informetrics, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.joi.2013.05.004 |
| Authors |
Han Woo Park, Loet Leydesdorff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 28% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 21% |
| Unknown | 16 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 69 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 21 | 11% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Informetrics
#515
of 754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,356
of 206,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Informetrics
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.