You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
International comparisons of health system performance among OECD countries: Opportunities and data privacy protection challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Policy, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.06.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jillian Oderkirk, Elettra Ronchi, Niek Klazinga |
| Abstract |
Health data constitute a significant resource in most OECD countries that could be used to improve health system performance. Well-intended policies to allay concerns about breaches of confidentiality and to reduce potential misuse of personal health information may be limiting data use. A survey of 20 OECD countries explored the extent to which countries have developed and use personal health data and the reasons why data use may be problematic in some. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 50% |
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Myanmar | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 16% |
| Researcher | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 19% |
| Unknown | 40 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 20 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 43 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,047,002
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health Policy
#1,188
of 2,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,733
of 206,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Policy
#27
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.