↓ Skip to main content

Leaving a Legacy Neutralizes Negative Effects of Death Anxiety on Creativity

Overview of attention for article published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Leaving a Legacy Neutralizes Negative Effects of Death Anxiety on Creativity
Published in
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, July 2013
DOI 10.1177/0146167213490804
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel J. Sligte, Bernard A. Nijstad, Carsten K. W. De Dreu

Abstract

Mortality salience (MS) can lead to a paralyzing terror, and to cope with this, people strive for literal or symbolic immortality. As MS leads to conformity and narrow-mindedness, we predicted that MS would lead to lower creativity, unless creativity itself could lead to leaving a legacy and thus symbolic immortality. We show that this pattern holds (Experiment 1), but only when creativity is socially valued (Experiment 2). Finally, especially individualistic people are more creative under MS when they can leave a legacy than when they cannot, and high originality predicts subsequent accessibility of death thoughts (Experiment 3). Implications are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 68 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 30%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 39%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#484,654
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#337
of 2,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,440
of 206,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.