You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: Observations in 6 million screens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Cancer (1965), July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paula A. van Luijt, Jacques Fracheboud, Eveline A.M. Heijnsdijk, Gerard J. den Heeten, Harry J. de Koning, Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening in the Netherlands Study Group . |
| Abstract |
To critically evaluate and confirm previous results regarding the diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography screening (DM), compared to screen-film mammography (SFM) in the whole Dutch screening programme, in the period of 2004-2010, during which a full transition from SFM to DM was made. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 46% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#5,277
of 6,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,277
of 191,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#34
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.