You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The influence of weather on the flight altitude of nocturnal migrants in mid‐latitudes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ibis, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ibi.12064 |
| Authors |
Michael U. Kemp, Judy Shamoun‐Baranes, Adriaan M. Dokter, Emiel van Loon, Willem Bouten |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| Latvia | 1 | 8% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 27% |
| Researcher | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 19% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2017.
All research outputs
#5,271,950
of 25,059,640 outputs
Outputs from Ibis
#1,035
of 2,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,184
of 204,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ibis
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,059,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.