↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance imaging-defined areas of microvascular obstruction after acute myocardial infarction represent microvascular destruction and haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging-defined areas of microvascular obstruction after acute myocardial infarction represent microvascular destruction and haemorrhage
Published in
European Heart Journal, April 2013
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/eht100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lourens F.H.J. Robbers, Elise S. Eerenberg, Paul F.A. Teunissen, Matthijs F. Jansen, Maurits R. Hollander, Anton J.G. Horrevoets, Paul Knaapen, Robin Nijveldt, Martijn W. Heymans, Marcel M. Levi, Albert C. van Rossum, Hans W.M. Niessen, C. Bogdan Marcu, Aernout M. Beek, Niels van Royen

Abstract

Lack of gadolinium-contrast wash-in on first-pass perfusion imaging, early gadolinium-enhanced imaging, or late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging after revascularized ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is commonly referred to as microvascular obstruction (MVO). Additionally, T2-weighted imaging allows for the visualization of infarct-related oedema and intramyocardial haemorrhage (IMH) within the infarction. However, the exact histopathological correlate of the contrast-devoid core and its relation to IMH is unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 54%
Engineering 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 31 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#5,838
of 11,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,680
of 209,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#44
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.