↓ Skip to main content

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease Consensus Statement of the European…

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1367 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease Consensus Statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society
Published in
European Heart Journal, August 2013
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/eht273
Pubmed ID
Authors

Børge G. Nordestgaard, M. John Chapman, Steve E. Humphries, Henry N. Ginsberg, Luis Masana, Olivier S. Descamps, Olov Wiklund, Robert A. Hegele, Frederick J. Raal, Joep C. Defesche, Albert Wiegman, Raul D. Santos, Gerald F. Watts, Klaus G. Parhofer, G. Kees Hovingh, Petri T. Kovanen, Catherine Boileau, Maurizio Averna, Jan Borén, Eric Bruckert, Alberico L. Catapano, Jan Albert Kuivenhoven, Päivi Pajukanta, Kausik Ray, Anton F. H. Stalenhoef, Erik Stroes, Marja-Riitta Taskinen, Anne Tybjærg-Hansen

Abstract

The first aim was to critically evaluate the extent to which familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is underdiagnosed and undertreated. The second aim was to provide guidance for screening and treatment of FH, in order to prevent coronary heart disease (CHD).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 5 <1%
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 1339 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 186 14%
Student > Bachelor 165 12%
Student > Master 160 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 141 10%
Other 98 7%
Other 269 20%
Unknown 348 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 485 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 156 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 51 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 3%
Other 134 10%
Unknown 409 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 221. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#176,634
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#311
of 11,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,107
of 210,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#1
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.