↓ Skip to main content

Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta‐analysis of instrumented knee laxity tests

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta‐analysis of instrumented knee laxity tests
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00167-012-2246-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carola F. van Eck, Miette Loopik, Michel P. van den Bekerom, Freddie H. Fu, Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs

Abstract

The aims of this meta-analysis were to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the KT 1000 Arthrometer, Stryker Knee Laxity Tester and Genucom Knee Analysis System for ACL rupture. It was hypothesized that the KT 1000 test is the most sensitive and specific. Secondly, it was hypothesized that the sensitivity and specificity of the KT 1000 arthrometer increase when the amount of Newton force is increased.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 29 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 14%
Sports and Recreations 11 11%
Engineering 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 31 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2014.
All research outputs
#13,390,169
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,415
of 2,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,575
of 175,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#26
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.