↓ Skip to main content

Consensus and variations in opinions on delirium care: a survey of European delirium specialists

Overview of attention for article published in International Psychogeriatrics, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consensus and variations in opinions on delirium care: a survey of European delirium specialists
Published in
International Psychogeriatrics, August 2013
DOI 10.1017/s1041610213001415
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Morandi, D. Davis, J. K. Taylor, G. Bellelli, B. Olofsson, S. Kreisel, A. Teodorczuk, B. Kamholz, W. Hasemann, J. Young, M. Agar, S. E. de Rooij, D. Meagher, M. Trabucchi, A. M. MacLullich

Abstract

There are still substantial uncertainties over best practice in delirium care. The European Delirium Association (EDA) conducted a survey of its members and other interested parties on various aspects of delirium care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 28 24%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Psychology 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,432,090
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from International Psychogeriatrics
#174
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,442
of 210,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Psychogeriatrics
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.