You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of intracoronary bone marrow cell therapy on left ventricular function in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a collaborative meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Heart Journal, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1093/eurheartj/eht372 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ronak Delewi, Alexander Hirsch, Jan G. Tijssen, Volker Schächinger, Wojciech Wojakowski, Jérôme Roncalli, Svend Aakhus, Sandra Erbs, Birgit Assmus, Michal Tendera, R. Goekmen Turan, Roberto Corti, Tim Henry, Patricia Lemarchand, Ketil Lunde, Feng Cao, Heikki V. Huikuri, Daniel Sürder, Robert D. Simari, Stefan Janssens, Kai C. Wollert, Michal Plewka, Stefan Grajek, Jay H. Traverse, Felix Zijlstra, Jan J. Piek |
| Abstract |
The objective of the present analysis was to systematically examine the effect of intracoronary bone marrow cell (BMC) therapy on left ventricular (LV) function after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in various subgroups of patients by performing a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,918,876
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#2,655
of 11,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,623
of 210,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#20
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.