You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of an E-mental Health Approach to Workers' Health Surveillance versus Control Group on Work Functioning of Hospital Employees: A Cluster-RCT
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0072546 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah M. Ketelaar, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, Fania R. Gärtner, Linda Bolier, Odile Smeets, Judith K. Sluiter |
Abstract |
To evaluate an e-mental health (EMH) approach to workers' health surveillance (WHS) targeting work functioning (WF) and mental health (MH) of healthcare professionals in a randomised controlled trial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 107 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 19% |
Researcher | 18 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 15% |
Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 28 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,395,364
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#76,740
of 193,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,533
of 198,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,721
of 4,974 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,974 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.