You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What do we know about tocolytic effectiveness and how do we use this information in guidelines? A comparison of evidence grading
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1471-0528.12388 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C Roos, E Borowiack, M Kowalska, A Zapalska, BW Mol, L Mignini, C Meads, J Walczak, KS Khan, the EBM CONNECT collaboration |
| Abstract |
Evidence summaries of tocolytic effectiveness assign quality levels based on a single dimension: the study design. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system takes into account several domains, including limitations of the study design and ranking the importance of outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,015,637
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#5,248
of 6,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,096
of 211,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#31
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.