You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgery versus Physiotherapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1210627 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julien Labrie, Bary L C M Berghmans, Kathelijn Fischer, Alfredo L Milani, Ileana van der Wijk, Dina J C Smalbraak, Astrid Vollebregt, René P Schellart, Giuseppe C M Graziosi, J Marinus van der Ploeg, Joseph F G M Brouns, E Stella M Tiersma, Annette G Groenendijk, Piet Scholten, Ben Willem Mol, Elisabeth E Blokhuis, Albert H Adriaanse, Aaltje Schram, Jan-Paul W R Roovers, Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen, Carl H van der Vaart |
| Abstract |
Physiotherapy involving pelvic-floor muscle training is advocated as first-line treatment for stress urinary incontinence; midurethral-sling surgery is generally recommended when physiotherapy is unsuccessful. Data are lacking from randomized trials comparing these two options as initial therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 10% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 274 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 14% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Researcher | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 77 | 27% |
| Unknown | 53 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 144 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 61 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#427,910
of 24,383,935 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#6,100
of 31,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,391
of 206,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#88
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,383,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.