↓ Skip to main content

Diffusion tensor imaging as a prognostic biomarker for motor recovery and rehabilitation after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diffusion tensor imaging as a prognostic biomarker for motor recovery and rehabilitation after stroke
Published in
Neuroradiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00234-017-1816-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josep Puig, Gerard Blasco, Gottfried Schlaug, Cathy M Stinear, Pepus Daunis-i-Estadella, Carles Biarnes, Jaume Figueras, Joaquín Serena, Maria Hernández-Pérez, Angel Alberich-Bayarri, Mar Castellanos, David S Liebeskind, Andrew M Demchuk, Bijoy K Menon, Götz Thomalla, Kambiz Nael, Max Wintermark, Salvador Pedraza

Abstract

Despite improved acute treatment and new tools to facilitate recovery, most patients have motor deficits after stroke, often causing disability. However, motor impairment varies considerably among patients, and recovery in the acute/subacute phase is difficult to predict using clinical measures alone, particularly in severely impaired patients. Accurate early prediction of recovery would help rationalize rehabilitation goals and improve the design of trials testing strategies to facilitate recovery. We review the role of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in predicting motor recovery after stroke, in monitoring treatment response, and in evaluating white matter remodeling. We critically appraise DTI studies and discuss their limitations, and we explore directions for future study. Growing evidence suggests that combining clinical scores with information about corticospinal tract (CST) integrity can improve predictions about motor outcome. The extent of CST damage on DTI and/or the overlap between the CST and a lesion are key prognostic factor that determines motor performance and outcome. Three main strategies to quantify stroke-related CST damage have been proposed: (i) measuring FA distal to the stroke area, (ii) measuring the number of fibers that go through the stroke with tractography, and (iii) measuring the overlap between the stroke and a CST map derived from healthy age- and gender-matched controls. Recovery of motor function probably involves remodeling of the CST proper and/or a greater reliance on alternative motor tracts through spontaneous and treatment-induced plasticity. DTI-metrics represent promising clinical biomarkers to predict motor recovery and to monitor and predict the response to neurorehabilitative interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 229 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 60 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 21%
Neuroscience 48 21%
Engineering 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 76 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,130,210
of 24,266,964 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#195
of 1,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,770
of 311,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,266,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,479 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.