You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PLS3 Mutations in X-Linked Osteoporosis with Fractures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1308223 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fleur S. van Dijk, M. Carola Zillikens, Dimitra Micha, Markus Riessland, Carlo L.M. Marcelis, Christine E. de Die-Smulders, Janine Milbradt, Anton A. Franken, Arjan J. Harsevoort, Klaske D. Lichtenbelt, Hans E. Pruijs, M. Estela Rubio-Gozalbo, Rolf Zwertbroek, Youssef Moutaouakil, Jaqueline Egthuijsen, Matthias Hammerschmidt, Renate Bijman, Cor M. Semeins, Astrid D. Bakker, Vincent Everts, Jenneke Klein-Nulend, Natalia Campos-Obando, Albert Hofman, Gerard J. te Meerman, Annemieke J.M.H. Verkerk, André G. Uitterlinden, Alessandra Maugeri, Erik A. Sistermans, Quinten Waisfisz, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Brunhilde Wirth, Marleen E.H. Simon, Gerard Pals |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 24% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 16% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 24% |
| Unknown | 15 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 18% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,110,823
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#10,145
of 32,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,745
of 222,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#157
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.