You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical decision support systems: Need for evidence, need for evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.05.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elske Ammenwerth, Pirkko Nykänen, Michael Rigby, Nicolette de Keizer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 24% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 22 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 23% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
#711
of 913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,933
of 208,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.