↓ Skip to main content

Central Versus Peripheral Blood Pressure in Malignant Hypertension; Effects of Antihypertensive Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Hypertension, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Central Versus Peripheral Blood Pressure in Malignant Hypertension; Effects of Antihypertensive Treatment
Published in
American Journal of Hypertension, January 2013
DOI 10.1093/ajh/hps075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bas van den Bogaard, Rogier V. Immink, Berend E. Westerhof, Gert A. van Montfrans, Johannes J. van Lieshout, Bert-Jan H. van den Born

Abstract

Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and labetalol are recommended for the immediate treatment of malignant hypertension. Both are intravenous agents but have different effects on systemic hemodynamics, and may have differential effects on pulse-wave reflection and pulse-pressure amplification, with consequences for peripheral versus central blood pressures (BPs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Other 3 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Sports and Recreations 2 10%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,281,593
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Hypertension
#1,404
of 1,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,679
of 282,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Hypertension
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.