↓ Skip to main content

On the Nature and Nurture of Intelligence and Specific Cognitive Abilities

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
65 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the Nature and Nurture of Intelligence and Specific Cognitive Abilities
Published in
Psychological Science, October 2013
DOI 10.1177/0956797613493292
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kees-Jan Kan, Jelte M. Wicherts, Conor V. Dolan, Han L. J. van der Maas

Abstract

To further knowledge concerning the nature and nurture of intelligence, we scrutinized how heritability coefficients vary across specific cognitive abilities both theoretically and empirically. Data from 23 twin studies (combined N = 7,852) showed that (a) in adult samples, culture-loaded subtests tend to demonstrate greater heritability coefficients than do culture-reduced subtests; and (b) in samples of both adults and children, a subtest's proportion of variance shared with general intelligence is a function of its cultural load. These findings require an explanation because they do not follow from mainstream theories of intelligence. The findings are consistent with our hypothesis that heritability coefficients differ across cognitive abilities as a result of differences in the contribution of genotype-environment covariance. The counterintuitive finding that the most heritable abilities are the most culture-dependent abilities sheds a new light on the long-standing nature-nurture debate of intelligence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 249 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 54 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 13%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Master 27 10%
Other 15 6%
Other 58 22%
Unknown 42 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 118 45%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 56 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#523,979
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#1,089
of 4,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,153
of 223,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#49
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.