↓ Skip to main content

A new class of animal collagen masquerading as an insect silk

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new class of animal collagen masquerading as an insect silk
Published in
Scientific Reports, October 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep02864
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tara D. Sutherland, Yong Y. Peng, Holly E. Trueman, Sarah Weisman, Shoko Okada, Andrew A. Walker, Alagacone Sriskantha, Jacinta F. White, Mickey G. Huson, Jerome A. Werkmeister, Veronica Glattauer, Violet Stoichevska, Stephen T. Mudie, Victoria S. Haritos, John A. M. Ramshaw

Abstract

Collagen is ubiquitous throughout the animal kingdom, where it comprises some 28 diverse molecules that form the extracellular matrix within organisms. In the 1960s, an extracorporeal animal collagen that forms the cocoon of a small group of hymenopteran insects was postulated. Here we categorically demonstrate that the larvae of a sawfly species produce silk from three small collagen proteins. The native proteins do not contain hydroxyproline, a post translational modification normally considered characteristic of animal collagens. The function of the proteins as silks explains their unusual collagen features. Recombinant proteins could be produced in standard bacterial expression systems and assembled into stable collagen molecules, opening the door to manufacture a new class of artificial collagen materials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 19 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Chemistry 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Unspecified 3 5%
Materials Science 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,349,805
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#92,602
of 122,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,774
of 207,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#484
of 651 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 651 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.