You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of plant invasions on local arthropod communities: a meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ecology, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2745.12176 |
| Authors |
Thomas van Hengstum, Danny A. P. Hooftman, J. Gerard B. Oostermeijer, Peter H. van Tienderen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 30% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 74% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Hungary | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 23% |
| Researcher | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 100 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 49 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 35 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,875,332
of 24,616,908 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ecology
#522
of 3,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,517
of 221,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ecology
#6
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,616,908 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.