↓ Skip to main content

Internet-based Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretations in patients with anxiety disorders: A randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Internet-based Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretations in patients with anxiety disorders: A randomised controlled trial
Published in
Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.10.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elske Salemink, Merel Kindt, Henk Rienties, Marcel van den Hout

Abstract

Previous research suggests that negative interpretation biases stimulate anxiety. As patients with an anxiety disorder tend to interpret ambiguous information negatively, it was hypothesised that training more positive interpretations reduces negative interpretation biases and emotional problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 183 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 20%
Researcher 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 29 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 107 57%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 10%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2013.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry
#658
of 1,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,649
of 223,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.