↓ Skip to main content

Critical Landau Velocity in Helium Nanodroplets

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Critical Landau Velocity in Helium Nanodroplets
Published in
Physical Review Letters, October 2013
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.111.153002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nils B. Brauer, Szymon Smolarek, Evgeniy Loginov, David Mateo, Alberto Hernando, Marti Pi, Manuel Barranco, Wybren J. Buma, Marcel Drabbels

Abstract

The best-known property of superfluid helium is the vanishing viscosity that objects experience while moving through the liquid with speeds below the so-called critical Landau velocity. This critical velocity is generally considered a macroscopic property as it is related to the collective excitations of the helium atoms in the liquid. In the present work we determine to what extent this concept can still be applied to nanometer-scale, finite size helium systems. To this end, atoms and molecules embedded in helium nanodroplets of various sizes are accelerated out of the droplets by means of optical excitation, and the speed distributions of the ejected particles are determined. The measurements reveal the existence of a critical velocity in these systems, even for nanodroplets consisting of only a thousand helium atoms. Accompanying theoretical simulations based on a time-dependent density functional description of the helium confirm and further elucidate this experimental finding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 44%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 16 59%
Chemistry 5 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2013.
All research outputs
#1,657,104
of 25,364,603 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#5,223
of 39,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,088
of 222,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#64
of 622 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 622 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.