You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deviance and Dissent in Groups
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annual Review of Psychology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115151 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jolanda Jetten, Matthew J. Hornsey |
| Abstract |
Traditionally, group research has focused more on the motivations that make people conform than on the motivations and conditions underpinning deviance and dissent. This has led to a literature that focuses on the value that groups place on uniformity and paints a relatively dark picture of dissent and deviance: as reflections of a lack of group loyalty, as signs of disengagement, or as delinquent behavior. An alternative point of view, which has gained momentum in recent years, focuses on deviance and dissent as normal and healthy aspects of group life. In this review, we focus on the motivations that group members have to deviate and dissent, and the functional as well as the dysfunctional effects of deviance and dissent. In doing so we aim for a balanced and complete account of deviance and dissent, highlighting when such behaviors will be encouraged as well as when they will be punished. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 13% |
| China | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 411 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 108 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 71 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 10% |
| Researcher | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 70 | 16% |
| Unknown | 65 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 177 | 41% |
| Social Sciences | 60 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 58 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 36 | 8% |
| Unknown | 82 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,372,943
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Psychology
#577
of 831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,976
of 209,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Psychology
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.