↓ Skip to main content

Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
31 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
622 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001055.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chamberlain, Catherine, O'Mara-Eves, Alison, Oliver, Sandy, Caird, Jenny R, Perlen, Susan M, Eades, Sandra J, Thomas, James, Catherine Chamberlain, Alison O'Mara‐Eves, Sandy Oliver, Jenny R Caird, Susan M Perlen, Sandra J Eades, James Thomas

Abstract

Tobacco smoking in pregnancy remains one of the few preventable factors associated with complications in pregnancy, stillbirth, low birthweight and preterm birth and has serious long-term implications for women and babies. Smoking in pregnancy is decreasing in high-income countries, but is strongly associated with poverty and increasing in low- to middle-income countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 622 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 609 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 113 18%
Student > Bachelor 95 15%
Researcher 81 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 5%
Other 90 14%
Unknown 129 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 178 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 12%
Psychology 71 11%
Social Sciences 66 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 3%
Other 71 11%
Unknown 145 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 174. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#231,553
of 25,386,051 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#393
of 12,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,673
of 224,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.