↓ Skip to main content

Childhood Brain Tumor Survivors at Risk for Impaired Health-related Quality of Life

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Hematology / Oncology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Childhood Brain Tumor Survivors at Risk for Impaired Health-related Quality of Life
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Hematology / Oncology, November 2013
DOI 10.1097/mph.0b013e31829b7ec6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eline J. Aukema, A. Y. Netteke Schouten-van Meeteren, Bob F. Last, Heleen Maurice-Stam, Martha A. Grootenhuis

Abstract

This study aimed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL)-mean scores and percentages at risk for impaired HRQOL in childhood brain tumor survivors (CBTS) and to explore differences between CBTS treated with surgery only (SO) versus CBTS treated with surgery and adjuvant therapy (SA). HRQOL was evaluated in 34 CBTS (mean age=14.7 y; mean time since the end of treatment=6.4 y) with the KIDSCREEN. Being at risk for impaired HRQOL was defined as a T-score ≥1 SD below the norm population mean. The total and the SA group, but not the SO group, had significantly lower mean scores than the Dutch norm population in the domains of "physical well-being," "psychological well-being," and "peers and social support." High percentages (35% to 53%) of both the SO and the SA groups appeared to be at risk for impaired HRQOL in the domains of "physical well-being," "moods and emotions," "peers and social support," and "bullying," compared to 16% in the norm population. In conclusion, although HRQOL in some domains appeared similar to the norm population, a considerable number of CBTS-reported impaired HRQOL in several other domains. It is recommended to systematically monitor HRQOL in CBTS regardless of the therapy applied.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 25%
Psychology 13 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Hematology / Oncology
#990
of 1,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,735
of 226,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Hematology / Oncology
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,895 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.