You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unregulated hunting and genetic recovery from a severe population decline: the cautionary case of Bulgarian wolves
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-013-0547-y |
| Authors |
Andre E. Moura, Elena Tsingarska, Michał J. Dąbrowski, Sylwia D. Czarnomska, Bogumiła Jędrzejewska, Małgorzata Pilot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Serbia | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 138 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 89 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,244,876
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#225
of 1,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,150
of 230,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.