↓ Skip to main content

Personality and physiological reactions to acute psychological stress

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Psychophysiology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Personality and physiological reactions to acute psychological stress
Published in
International Journal of Psychophysiology, November 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.10.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Bibbey, Douglas Carroll, Tessa J. Roseboom, Anna C. Phillips, Susanne R. de Rooij

Abstract

Stable personality traits have long been presumed to have biological substrates, although the evidence relating personality to biological stress reactivity is inconclusive. The present study examined, in a large middle aged cohort (N=352), the relationship between key personality traits and both cortisol and cardiovascular reactions to acute psychological stress. Salivary cortisol and cardiovascular activity were measured at rest and in response to a psychological stress protocol comprising 5min each of a Stroop task, mirror tracing, and a speech task. Participants subsequently completed the Big Five Inventory to assess neuroticism, agreeableness, openness to experience, extraversion, and conscientiousness. Those with higher neuroticism scores exhibited smaller cortisol and cardiovascular stress reactions, whereas participants who were less agreeable and less open had smaller cortisol and cardiac reactions to stress. These associations remained statistically significant following adjustment for a range of potential confounding variables. Thus, a negative personality disposition would appear to be linked to diminished stress reactivity. These findings further support a growing body of evidence which suggests that blunted stress reactivity may be maladaptive.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 334 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 17%
Student > Master 43 13%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 71 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 129 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 8%
Neuroscience 19 6%
Sports and Recreations 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Other 57 17%
Unknown 83 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Psychophysiology
#961
of 1,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,386
of 196,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Psychophysiology
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.