↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of fermentation selectivity of purified galacto-oligosaccharides by in vitro human faecal fermentation

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of fermentation selectivity of purified galacto-oligosaccharides by in vitro human faecal fermentation
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00253-013-4892-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Rodriguez-Colinas, Sofia Kolida, Magdalena Baran, Antonio O. Ballesteros, Robert A. Rastall, Francisco J. Plou

Abstract

The in vitro fermentation of several purified galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), specifically the trisaccharides 4'-galactosyl-lactose and 6'-galactosyl-lactose and a mixture of the disaccharides 6-galactobiose and allolactose, was carried out. The bifidogenic effect of GOS at 1% (w/v) was studied in a pH-controlled batch culture fermentation system inoculated with healthy adult human faeces. Results were compared with those obtained with a commercial GOS mixture (Bimuno-GOS). Changes in bacterial populations measured through fluorescence in situ hybridization and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production were determined. Bifidobacteria increased after 10-h fermentation for all the GOS substrates, but the changes were only statistically significant (P<0.05) for the mixture of disaccharides and Bimuno-GOS. Acetic acid, whose formation is consistent with bifidobacteria metabolism, was the major SCFA synthesized. The acetate concentration at 10 h was similar with all the substrates (45-50 mM) and significantly higher than the observed for formic, propionic and butyric acids. All the purified GOS could be considered bifidogenic under the assayed conditions, displaying a selectivity index in the range 2.1-3.0, which was slightly lower than the determined for the commercial mixture Bimuno-GOS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 14%
Chemistry 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,922,529
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#6,246
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,521
of 196,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#65
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.