You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Attentional Modulation of Cell-Class-Specific Gamma-Band Synchronization in Awake Monkey Area V4
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuron, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Vinck, Thilo Womelsdorf, Elizabeth A. Buffalo, Robert Desimone, Pascal Fries |
| Abstract |
Selective visual attention is subserved by selective neuronal synchronization, entailing precise orchestration among excitatory and inhibitory cells. We tentatively identified these as broad (BS) and narrow spiking (NS) cells and analyzed their synchronization to the local field potential in two macaque monkeys performing a selective visual attention task. Across cells, gamma phases scattered widely but were unaffected by stimulation or attention. During stimulation, NS cells lagged BS cells on average by ∼60° and gamma synchronized twice as strongly. Attention enhanced and reduced the gamma locking of strongly and weakly activated cells, respectively. During a prestimulus attentional cue period, BS cells showed weak gamma synchronization, while NS cells gamma-synchronized as strongly as with visual stimulation. These analyses reveal the cell-type-specific dynamics of the gamma cycle in macaque visual cortex and suggest that attention affects neurons differentially depending on cell type and activation level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 290 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 29% |
| Researcher | 70 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 100 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 82 | 26% |
| Psychology | 33 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 4% |
| Engineering | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 50 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#8,244
of 9,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,869
of 226,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#107
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.