You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1312114110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingrid A. van de Leemput, Marieke Wichers, Angélique O. J. Cramer, Denny Borsboom, Francis Tuerlinckx, Peter Kuppens, Egbert H. van Nes, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Erik J. Giltay, Steven H. Aggen, Catherine Derom, Nele Jacobs, Kenneth S. Kendler, Han L. J. van der Maas, Michael C. Neale, Frenk Peeters, Evert Thiery, Peter Zachar, Marten Scheffer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 58% |
| Scientists | 7 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 738 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 695 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 171 | 23% |
| Researcher | 128 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 100 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 9% |
| Professor | 39 | 5% |
| Other | 125 | 17% |
| Unknown | 105 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 236 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 46 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 29 | 4% |
| Other | 180 | 24% |
| Unknown | 142 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#491,523
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#8,623
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,640
of 326,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#105
of 994 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 994 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.