The Amplituhedron

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 3,247)
  • High score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
The Amplituhedron
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/jhep10(2014)030
Authors

Nima Arkani-Hamed, Jaroslav Trnka

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics 1 33%
Mathematics 1 33%
Astronomy / Astrophysics / Space Science 1 33%

Score in context

This research output has an Altmetric score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This score was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,781
of 4,719,608 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#4
of 3,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#728
of 126,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,719,608 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this score to the 126,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.