You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of CPAP on Blood Pressure in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Resistant Hypertension: The HIPARCO Randomized Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2013.281250 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miguel-Angel Martínez-García, Francisco Capote, Francisco Campos-Rodríguez, Patricia Lloberes, María Josefa Díaz de Atauri, María Somoza, Juan F. Masa, Mónica González, Lirios Sacristán, Ferrán Barbé, Joaquín Durán-Cantolla, Felipe Aizpuru, Eva Mañas, Bienvenido Barreiro, Mar Mosteiro, Juan J. Cebrián, Mónica de la Peña, Francisco García-Río, Andrés Maimó, Jordi Zapater, Concepción Hernández, Nuria Grau SanMarti, Josep María Montserrat |
| Abstract |
More than 70% of patients with resistant hypertension have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, there is little evidence about the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 20% |
| Spain | 7 | 9% |
| Canada | 5 | 6% |
| Chile | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 64 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 16% |
| Scientists | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 330 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Other | 30 | 9% |
| Other | 101 | 30% |
| Unknown | 67 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 184 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 10% |
| Unknown | 76 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#411,260
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4,722
of 36,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,814
of 324,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#57
of 329 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 329 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.