Menstrual and fertility outcomes following the surgical management of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this score

  • In the top 25% of all articles scored by Altmetric
  • Good score compared to articles of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average score compared to articles of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this scholarly content. Click here to find out more.
Article title
Menstrual and fertility outcomes following the surgical management of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review
Published in
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, January 2013
DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.12546
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Uterine-sparing surgical interventions have long been practiced as an alternative to hysterectomy in the management of severe postpartum haemorrhage (PPH); however, the risks of impairment of subsequent fertility from such procedures are unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this article. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this article. Click here to see the article's page on the Mendeley website.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Doctoral Student 1 25%
Researcher (at an Academic Institution) 1 25%
Ph.D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%

Score in context

This article has an Altmetric score of 3.35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that this article has received. This score was calculated when the article was last mentioned on 15 March 2014.
All articles
#759,511
of 3,630,679 articles
Articles in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#512
of 1,597 articles
Articles of similar age
#26,878
of 113,160 articles
Articles of similar age in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#6
of 16 articles
Altmetric has tracked 3,630,679 articles across all sources so far. Compared to these this article has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all articles ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,597 articles from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean score of 6.0. This article has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older articles will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this score to the 113,160 tracked articles that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This article has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this article to 16 articles from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This article has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.