↓ Skip to main content

Introgression of Crop Alleles into Wild or Weedy Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Introgression of Crop Alleles into Wild or Weedy Populations
Published in
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, November 2013
DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135840
Authors

Norman C. Ellstrand, Patrick Meirmans, Jun Rong, Detlef Bartsch, Atiyo Ghosh, Tom J. de Jong, Patsy Haccou, Bao-Rong Lu, Allison A. Snow, C. Neal Stewart, Jared L. Strasburg, Peter H. van Tienderen, Klaas Vrieling, Danny Hooftman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 176 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 24%
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 67%
Environmental Science 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Unspecified 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 28 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,369,852
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#544
of 857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,310
of 315,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.