You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is Quantitative Research Ethical? Tools for Ethically Practicing, Evaluating, and Using Quantitative Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-017-3549-8 |
| Authors |
Michael J. Zyphur, Dean C. Pierides |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 531 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 531 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 79 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 47 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 61 | 11% |
| Unknown | 202 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 130 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 46 | 9% |
| Psychology | 26 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 20 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 79 | 15% |
| Unknown | 210 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,721,769
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#623
of 3,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,965
of 311,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#18
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.