↓ Skip to main content

Broken windows, mediocre methods, and substandard statistics

Overview of attention for article published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Broken windows, mediocre methods, and substandard statistics
Published in
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, December 2013
DOI 10.1177/1368430213502557
Authors

Jelte M. Wicherts, Marjan Bakker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 22 30%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 27%
Social Sciences 18 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 19 26%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,072,125
of 24,340,143 outputs
Outputs from Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
#314
of 843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,573
of 317,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,340,143 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.