You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Open source clinical science for emerging infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70327-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jake W Dunning, Laura Merson, Gernot G U Rohde, Zhancheng Gao, Malcolm G Semple, Dat Tran, Anthony Gordon, Piero L Olliaro, Saye H Khoo, Roberto Bruzzone, Peter Horby, J Perren Cobb, Kajsa-Stina Longuere, Paul Kellam, Alistair Nichol, Stephen Brett, Dean Everett, Timothy S Walsh, Tran-Tinh Hien, Hongjie Yu, Maria Zambon, Guillermo Ruiz-Palacios, Trudie Lang, Tamuna Akhvlediani, ISARIC Council ISARIC Working Group 3, Frederick G Hayden, John Marshall, Steve Webb, Derek C Angus, Nahoko Shindo, Sylvie van der Werf, Peter J M Openshaw, Jeremy Farrar, Gail Carson, J Kenneth Baillie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 33% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 50% |
| Scientists | 11 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Vietnam | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,170,276
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1,534
of 6,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,332
of 323,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#15
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 93.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.