↓ Skip to main content

Patients with unexplained physical symptoms have poorer quality of life and higher costs than other patient groups: a cross-sectional study on burden

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patients with unexplained physical symptoms have poorer quality of life and higher costs than other patient groups: a cross-sectional study on burden
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-520
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lyonne NL Zonneveld, Mirjam AG Sprangers, Cornelis G Kooiman, Adriaan van ’t Spijker, Jan JV Busschbach

Abstract

To determine whether healthcare resources are allocated fairly, it is helpful to have information on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with Unexplained Physical Symptoms (UPS) and on the costs associated with them, and on how these relate to corresponding data in other patient groups. As studies to date have been limited to specific patient populations with UPS, the objective of this study was to assess QoL and costs in a general sample of patients with UPS using generic measures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 30 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 35 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,622,789
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,763
of 7,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,678
of 291,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#50
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.