↓ Skip to main content

Replicated Evidence of Absence of Association between Serum S100B and (Risk of) Psychotic Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Replicated Evidence of Absence of Association between Serum S100B and (Risk of) Psychotic Disorder
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0082535
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine van der Leeuw, Machteld Marcelis, Sanne C. T. Peeters, Marcel M. Verbeek, Paul P. C. A. Menheere, Lieuwe de Haan, Jim van Os, Nico J. M. van Beveren

Abstract

S100B is a potential marker of neurological and psychiatric illness. In schizophrenia, increased S100B levels, as well as associations with acute positive and persisting negative symptoms, have been reported. It remains unclear whether S100B elevation, which possibly reflects glial dysfunction, is the consequence of disease or compensatory processes, or whether it is an indicator of familial risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 27%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Lecturer 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 34%
Psychology 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,351,826
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#135,683
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,181
of 309,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,962
of 5,569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.