↓ Skip to main content

How Instructors’ Emotional Expressions Shape Students’ Learning Performance: The Roles of Anger, Happiness, and Regulatory Focus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Instructors’ Emotional Expressions Shape Students’ Learning Performance: The Roles of Anger, Happiness, and Regulatory Focus
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, June 2014
DOI 10.1037/a0035226
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evert A. van Doorn, Gerben A. van Kleef, Joop van der Pligt

Abstract

How do instructors' emotional expressions influence students' learning performance? Scholars and practitioners alike have emphasized the importance of positive, nurturing emotions for successful learning. However, teachers may sometimes lose their temper and express anger at their pupils. Drawing on emotions as social information (EASI) theory, we hypothesized that expressions of anger can benefit learning performance. In Experiment 1, participants who were confronted with an angry instructor exhibited more accurate recognition of word pairs after a week of learning, compared with those who were confronted with a happy instructor. In Experiment 2, we conceptually replicated this effect on a recall task, but only among participants in a promotion rather than prevention focus. Present findings thus show, for the 1st time, that instructor anger can enhance students' performance. Findings are consistent with a conceptualization of emotion as social information and call into question the generally endorsed positivity paradigm. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
China 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 25%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 41%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 13%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,778,730
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
#1,190
of 2,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,901
of 240,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.