↓ Skip to main content

Basic concepts of fluid responsiveness

Overview of attention for article published in Netherlands Heart Journal, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Basic concepts of fluid responsiveness
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12471-013-0487-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. G. V. Cherpanath, B. F. Geerts, W. K. Lagrand, M. J. Schultz, A. B. J. Groeneveld

Abstract

Predicting fluid responsiveness, the response of stroke volume to fluid loading, is a relatively novel concept that aims to optimise circulation, and as such organ perfusion, while avoiding futile and potentially deleterious fluid administrations in critically ill patients. Dynamic parameters have shown to be superior in predicting the response to fluid loading compared with static cardiac filling pressures. However, in routine clinical practice the conditions necessary for dynamic parameters to predict fluid responsiveness are frequently not met. Passive leg raising as a means to alter biventricular preload in combination with subsequent measurement of the change in stroke volume can provide a fast and accurate way to guide fluid management in a broad population of critically ill patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Romania 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 24 14%
Student > Postgraduate 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 60%
Engineering 11 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 39 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,359,382
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Netherlands Heart Journal
#367
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,132
of 212,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Netherlands Heart Journal
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.