↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review and meta‐analysis of population‐based mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Surgery, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
203 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review and meta‐analysis of population‐based mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
Published in
British Journal of Surgery, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/bjs.9235
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. J. Reimerink, M. J. van der Laan, M. J. Koelemay, R. Balm, D. A. Legemate

Abstract

A substantial proportion of patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) die outside hospital. The objective of this study was to estimate the total mortality, including prehospital deaths, of patients with rAAA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 183 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 16%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Master 20 11%
Other 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 46 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 53%
Engineering 11 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 63 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,877,625
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#868
of 6,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,043
of 213,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.