↓ Skip to main content

Publication and Reporting of Test Accuracy Studies Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Chemistry, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Publication and Reporting of Test Accuracy Studies Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
Published in
Clinical Chemistry, April 2014
DOI 10.1373/clinchem.2013.218149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniël A. Korevaar, Eleanor A. Ochodo, Patrick M.M. Bossuyt, Lotty Hooft

Abstract

Failure to publish and selective reporting are recognized problems in the biomedical literature, but their extent in the field of diagnostic testing is unknown. We aimed to identify nonpublication and discrepancies between registered records and publications among registered test accuracy studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Professor 4 13%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 42%
Psychology 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2014.
All research outputs
#13,703,977
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry
#6,150
of 7,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,270
of 226,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry
#22
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.