↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic optimisation of intravenous tobramycin dosing among children with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic optimisation of intravenous tobramycin dosing among children with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10928-013-9348-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine M. T. Sherwin, Jeffery T. Zobell, Chris Stockmann, Bradley E. McCrory, Millie Wisdom, David C. Young, Jared Olson, Krow Ampofo, Michael G. Spigarelli

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetics of tobramycin administered one, two, or three times daily and to develop an optimal dosing scheme for children with cystic fibrosis. Therapeutic drug monitoring data were obtained from children hospitalized at three academic medical centres from 2006 to 2012. Population pharmacokinetic models were constructed using NONMEM 7.2. Model-based simulations were performed in Matlab R2012b to identify optimal dosing regimens using pharmacodynamic targets. The pharmacokinetic analysis involved 257 patients with a median age of 8.1 years (range 0.1-18.8). Clearance was estimated as 5.59 L/h and the volume of distribution was 18.90 L. Mean (±SD) maximum serum concentrations were highest among patients dosed once per day (24.1 ± 8.9 μg/mL) and were lower among patients dosed two and three times per day (11.2 ± 1.4 and 8.1 ± 2.4 μg/mL, respectively). Simulations revealed that once daily dosing was the only effective regimen for a Pseudomonas aeruginosa MIC of 1.5 μg/mL and none of the tested regimens reliably achieved the pharmacodynamic target for MICs ≥2 μg/mL. Once daily dosing resulted in higher maximum serum concentrations when compared to multiple-daily dosing. In simulations, once daily dosing was the only regimen to achieve the pharmacodynamic target for all subjects with MICs <2 μg/mL.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
#435
of 477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,676
of 318,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them