Title |
Assessment of Truflex™ articulating stylet versus conventional rigid Portex™ stylet as an intubation guide with the D-blade of C-Mac™ videolaryngoscope during elective tracheal intubation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-14-298 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aida Al-Qasmi, Wafa Al-Alawi, Azharuddin Mohammed Malik, Rashid Manzoor Khan, Naresh Kaul |
Abstract |
A variety of videolaryngoscopes with angulated blade have been recently introduced into clinical practice. They provide an indirect view of the glottic structures in normal and challenging clinical settings. Despite the very good visualization of the laryngeal structures by these devices, the insertion and advancement of the endotracheal tube may be prolonged and occasionally fail as it does not conform to the enhanced angulation of the blade. To overcome this handicap, it is recommended to use a pre-shaped, styleted tracheal tube during intubation. Unfortunately, these malleable rigid stylets permit only a fixed shape to the advancing endotracheal tube. This may necessitate withdrawal of endotracheal tube-stylet assembly for reshaping, before undertaking a new attempt. This may cause soft tissue injury and hemodynamic disturbance.This single-blinded randomized clinical trial aims to overcome these handicaps using a novel method of dynamically changing the shape of the advancing endotracheal tube by Truflex articulating stylet as per need during D-blade C-Mac videolaryngoscopy. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 23% |
Researcher | 8 | 14% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 50% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 27% |