↓ Skip to main content

Eating to stop: Tyrosine supplementation enhances inhibitory control but not response execution

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychologia, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 4,173)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eating to stop: Tyrosine supplementation enhances inhibitory control but not response execution
Published in
Neuropsychologia, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorenza S. Colzato, Bryant J. Jongkees, Roberta Sellaro, Wery P.M. van den Wildenberg, Bernhard Hommel

Abstract

Animal studies and research in humans have shown that the supplementation of tyrosine, or tyrosine-containing diets, increase the plasma tyrosine and enhance brain dopamine (DA). However, the strategy of administering tyrosine (and the role of DA therein) to enhance cognition is unclear and heavily debated. We studied, in a healthy population, whether tyrosine supplementation improves stopping overt responses, a core cognitive-control function. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, within-subject design, one hour following the administration of tyrosine (corresponding to the beginning of the 1h-peak of the plasma concentration) or placebo, participants performed a stop-signal task-which taps into response inhibition and response execution speed. Participants in the Tyrosine condition were more efficient in inhibiting unwanted action tendencies but not in reacting to go signals. This is the first demonstration that the supplementation of tyrosine selectively targets, and reliably improves the ability to stop overt responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Neuroscience 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 23 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#283,116
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychologia
#42
of 4,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,597
of 320,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychologia
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.