↓ Skip to main content

Barriers to and facilitators for screening women for intimate partner violence in surgical fracture clinics: a qualitative descriptive approach

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers to and facilitators for screening women for intimate partner violence in surgical fracture clinics: a qualitative descriptive approach
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheila Sprague, Marilyn Swinton, Kim Madden, Rukia Swaleh, J Carel Goslings, Brad Petrisor, Mohit Bhandari

Abstract

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a major health issue that involves any physical, sexual or psychological harm inflicted by a current or former partner. Musculoskeletal injuries represent the second most prevalent clinical manifestation of IPV. Health care professionals, however, rarely screen women for IPV. Using qualitative methods, this study aimed to explore the perceived barriers to IPV screening and potential facilitators for overcoming these barriers among orthopaedic surgeons and surgical trainees.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 39 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 24%
Social Sciences 14 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Psychology 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 43 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,689,396
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,512
of 4,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,754
of 201,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#66
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.