You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Learning to accept in ultimatum games: Evidence from an experimental design that generates low offers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experimental Economics, February 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01669205 |
| Authors |
John A. List, Todd L. Cherry |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 26 | 37% |
| Psychology | 14 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,415,054
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Economics
#78
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,784
of 111,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Economics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them